Drift and deposition of ultra-low altitude and low volume application in paddy field

Authors

  • Xue Xinyu 1. Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210014, China; 2.Nanjing Research Institute for Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014, China
  • Tu Kang 1. Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210014, China
  • Qin Weicai 2. Nanjing Research Institute for Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014, China
  • Lan Yubin 3. South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
  • Zhang Huihui 4. USDA-ARS, Fort Collins, CA, 80526, USA

Keywords:

paddy field, ultra-low altitude, low volume, UAV, droplet drift, deposition

Abstract

Abstract: Field trials were performed to evaluate various techniques for measuring spray deposition and aerial drift during spray application to paddy field. The application of a spraying agent containing the fluorescent dye Rhodamine-B was applied by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) which flew at a height of 5 m, a speed of 3 m/s, and the wind speed of 3 m/s. The results showed that because the downdraft produced by a helicopter rotor increased the penetrability of crops, there is a higher deposition on the upper layer and the under layer than the traditional spraying. The average deposition on the upper layer accounts for 28% of the total spraying ,the deposition on the under layer accounts for 26% of the total spraying. The deposition on the under layer takes up 92.8% of the deposition on the upper layer. Droplets drift data showed that the drift of non-target area took up 12.9% of the total liquid spray. The 90% drifting droplets were located within a range of 8 m of the target area; the drift quantity was almost zero at a distance of 50 m away from the treated area. Keywords: paddy field, ultra-low altitude, low volume, UAV, droplet drift, deposition DOI: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20140704.003 Citation: Xue X Y, Tu Kang, Qin W C, Lan Y B, Zhang H H. Drift and deposition of ultra-low altitude and low volume application in paddy field. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2014; 7(4): 23-28.

Author Biographies

Xue Xinyu, 1. Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210014, China; 2.Nanjing Research Institute for Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture, Nanjing 210014, China

Professor

Tu Kang, 1. Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210014, China

Professor

Lan Yubin, 3. South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China

Ph.D., Agricultural Engineer

Zhang Huihui, 4. USDA-ARS, Fort Collins, CA, 80526, USA

Ph.D., Research Agricultural Engineer

References

[1] Gao H W. Agricultural Production Mechanization. China Agriculture Press, 2002.
[2] Xue X Y, Lang J, Fu X M. Prospect of aviation plant protection in China. Chinese Agriculture, 2009; (10): 95-97.
[3] Xue X Y, Lan Y B. Agricultural aviation applications in USA. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2013; 44(5): 194–199.
[4] Whitney J D, Salyani M, Churchill D B, Knapp J L, Whiteside J O, Littell R C. A field investigation to examine the effects of the sprayer type, ground speed, and volume rate on spray deposition in Florida citrus. J Agric Eng Res, 1989; 42: 275–283.
[5] Hewitt A J. Spray drift: impact of requirements to protect the environment. Crop Protection, 2000; 19: 623–627.
[6] Coates W. Spraying technologies for cotton deposition and efficacy. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 1996; 12(3): 287–296.
[7] van de Zande J C, Huijsmans J F M, Porskamp H A J, Michielsen J M G P, Stallinga H, Holterman H J, et al. Spray techniques: how to optimise spray deposition and minimise spray drift. Environmentalist, 2008; 28: 9–17.
[8] Franz E,Bouse L F,Carlton J B, Kirk I W, Latheef M A.. Aerial spray deposit relations with plant canopy and weather parameters. Transactions of the ASAE, 1998, 41(4): 959–966.
[9] Ru Y, Zhou H P, Jia Z C, Wu X W, Fan Q N. Design and application of electrostatic spraying system. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2011; 35 (1): 91–94.
[10] Lan Y, Hoffmann W C, Fritz B K, Martin D E, Lopez J D, Jr.. Spray drift mitigation with spray mix adjuvants. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2008; 24(1): 5–10.
[11] Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C, Lan Y, Thomson S J, Huang Y.. Low-level atmospheric temperature inversion: Characteristics and impacts on agricultural applications. Agric. Eng. Int.: The CIGR EJournal X: PM-08-001, 2008.
[12] Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C, Jank P A. Fluorescent tracer method for evaluating spray transport and fate of field and laboratory spray applications. Journal of ASTM International, 2011; 8(3).
[13] Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C, Bagley W E. Effects of spray mixtures on droplet size under aerial application conditions and implications on drift. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2010; 26(1): 21–29.
[14] Zhou L X, Xue X Y, Sun Z, Qin W C, Zhang S C, Kong W. Experimental study on electrical-driven centrifugal nozzle of aerial sprays. Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2011; (1): 107–111.
[15] Xue X Y, Qin W C, Sun Z, Zhang S C, Zhou L X, Wu P. Effects of N-3 UAV spraying methods on the efficiency of insecticides against planthopper and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. ACTA Phytophyhatica sinica, 2013; (6): 273–277.

Downloads

Published

2014-08-25

How to Cite

Xinyu, X., Kang, T., Weicai, Q., Yubin, L., & Huihui, Z. (2014). Drift and deposition of ultra-low altitude and low volume application in paddy field. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 7(4), 23–28. Retrieved from https://ijabe.migration.pkpps03.publicknowledgeproject.org/index.php/ijabe/article/view/935

Issue

Section

Power and Machinery Systems