Analysis of the mechanical transfer characterization between lodged sugarcane and the cutter by simulation modeling with UMAT subroutine
Keywords:
sugarcane harvesting, UMAT, mechanical transfer characterization, cutter, simulation modelingAbstract
Cutting the roots of sugarcane using cutters is a critical part of sugarcane harvesting, and the degree of breakage of the roots after cutting affects the germination and growth of sugarcane to a certain extent in the following year. However, the intricate interactions between the cutter and the stalk remain unclear. In order to fill this gap, this study first analyzed the conditions for no missed cuts during the operation of a double-disk cutter. Secondly, the research established a model of sugarcane stalk with anisotropy using the User-defined Material Mechanical Behavior (UMAT) subroutine based on the secondary development module of ABAQUS/Explicit. The cutting force curves obtained from simulation and test show a high correlation coefficient (R2=0.9621), indicating the reliability of the model of sugarcane stalk in mechanical transfer. Subsequently, the simulation test of the blade rotating cutting characteristics in this study indicates that at a blade tilt angle of 11.3°, a blade rotating speed of 659.3 r/min, and a forward speed of 1.5 km/h, the maximum shear force on the blade is the largest, while the maximum cutting force is the smallest. Finally, based on the simulation results, this paper discussed the internal factors affecting the breakage rate of sugarcane stalks and predicted the damage location and damage force of the stalks by studying the stress wave transmission effect. Additionally, it analyzed the effects of single-knife cutting and multi-cutting on stalk incisions. The results indicated that multi-cutting causes more damage to the stalks and increases the breakage rate of sugarcane. The results of this study can provide a theoretical basis and technical reference for exploring the reduction of sugarcane residual cutting rate. Keywords: sugarcane harvesting, UMAT, mechanical transfer characterization, cutter, simulation modeling DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20241703.8880 Citation: Liu T, Wang Q Q, He J X, Xie D B, Liu Z P, Liu L C, et al. Analysis of the mechanical transfer characterization between lodged sugarcane and the cutter by simulation modeling with UMAT subroutine. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2024; 17(3): 39-49.References
[1] Arjona E, Bueno G, Salazar L. An activity simulation model for the analysis of the harvesting and transportation systems of a sugarcane plantation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2001; 32(3): 247–64.
[2] Santoro E, Soler E M, Cherri A C. Route optimization in mechanized sugarcane harvesting. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2017; 141: 140–6.
[3] Xie D B, Chen L, Liu L C, Chen L Q, Wang H. Actuators and sensors for application in agricultural robots: A review. Machines, 2022; 10(10): 913.
[4] Bai J, Ma S C, Wang F L, Xing H N, Ma J Z, Hu J W. Field test and evaluation on crop dividers of sugarcane chopper harvester. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2021; 14(1): 118–122.
[5] Liu X P, Niu Z J, Li M, Hou M X, Wei L J, Zhang Y, et al. Design and experimental research on disc-type seeding device for single-bud sugarcane seeds. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2023; 16(2): 115–124.
[6] Wang F L, Zhang W H, Di M L, Wu X H, Song Z H, Xie B, et al. Sugarcane cutting quality using contra-rotating basecutters. Transactions of the ASABE, 2019; 62(3): 737–47.
[7] Momin M A, Wempe P A, Grift T E, Hansen A C. Effects of four base cutter blade designs on sugarcane stem cut quality. Transactions of the ASABE, 2017; 60(5): 1551–60.
[8] Xie L X, Wang J, Cheng S M, Zeng B S, Yang Z Z. Performance evaluation of a chopper system for sugarcane harvester. Sugar Tech, 2019; 21(5): 825–837.
[9] Mo H N, Li S P, Zhou J H, Zeng B, He G Q, Qiu C. Simulation and experimental investigations on the sugarcane cutting mechanism and effects of influence factors on the cutting quality of small sugarcane harvesters under vibration excitations. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022; 2022: 1–28.
[10] Li Z, Lin Z L, Li S Y, Zhang H. Optimization research on the working parameters of sugarcane harvester on the cutting time of stalks using virtual prototype technology. Sugar Tech, 2023; 25(1): 41–56.
[11] Bai J, Ma S C, Ke W L, Wang F L, Xing H N, Ma J Z, et al. Experimental research on sugarcane under-the-ground basecutting. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2020; 36(3): 331–339.
[12] Mathanker S K, Grift T E, Hansen A C. Effect of blade oblique angle and cutting speed on cutting energy for energycane stems. Biosystems Engineering, 2015; 133: 64–70.
[13] Wang F L, Ma S C, Xing H N, Bai J, Ma J, Wang M L. Effect of contra-rotating basecutter parameters on basecutting losses. Sugar Tech, 2021; 23(2): 278–285.
[14] Rashvand M, Altieri G, Genovese F, Li Z G, Di Renzo G C. Numerical simulation as a tool for predicting mechanical damage in fresh fruit. Post-harvest Biology and Technology, 2022; 187: 111875.
[15] Wang T, Liu Z D, Yan X L, Mi G P, Liu S Y, Chen K Z, et al. Finite element model construction and cutting parameter calibration of wild chrysanthemum stem. Agriculture-Basel, 2022; 12(6): 894.
[16] Niu Z J, Xu Z, Deng J T, Zhang J, Pan S J, Mu H T. Optimal vibration parameters for olive harvesting from finite element analysis and vibration tests. Biosystems Engineering, 2022; 215: 228–238.
[17] Liu H J, Han X W, Fadiji T, Li Z, Ni J. Prediction of the cracking susceptibility of tomato pericarp: Three-point bending simulation using an extended finite element method. Post-harvest Biology and Technology, 2022; 187.
[18] Xie L X, Wang J, Cheng S M, Zeng B S, Yang Z Z. Optimisation and finite element simulation of the chopping process for chopper sugarcane harvesting. Biosystems Engineering, 2018; 175: 16–26.
[19] Qiu M M, Meng Y M, Li Y Z, Shen X B. Sugarcane stem cut quality investigated by finite element simulation and experiment. Biosystems Engineering, 2021; 206: 135–149.
[20] Wang Q Q, Zhang Q W, Zhang Y, Zhou G A, Li Z Q, Chen L Q. Lodged sugarcane/crop dividers interaction: analysis of robotic sugarcane harvester in agriculture via a rigid-flexible coupled simulation method. Actuators, 2022; 11(1): 23.
[21] Dai J P, Huang J K, Chen L H, Ji J N, Li J. Three-dimensional constitutive relation of the root-soil composite using homogenization theory. Transactions of the CSAE, 2022; 38(13): 76–83. (in Chinese)
[22] Xie L X, Wang J, Cheng S M, Zeng B S, Yang Z Z. Optimisation and dynamic simulation of a conveying and top breaking system for whole-stalk sugarcane harvesters. Biosystems Engineering, 2020; 197: 156–169.
[23] Huang H D, Wang Y X, Tang Y Q, Zhao F, Kong X F. Finite element simulation of sugarcane cutting. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011; 27(2): 161–166. (in Chinese)
[24] Mello R D C, Harris H. Hogarth D M. Cane damage and mass losses for conventional and serrated basecutter blades. Proc Aust Soc Sugar Cane Tech, 2000; 6: 84–91.
[25] Luo Y Q, Ren Y H, Zhou Z X, Huang X M, Song T J. Prediction of single-tooth sawing force based on tooth profile parameters. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016; 86(1-4): 641–650.
[26] Zhou Y, Qu Y G, Mo Z F. Design and experiment of oblique cutting and feeding device for sugarcane. Transactions of the CSAE, 2012; 28(14): 17–23. (in Chinese)
[27] Yang W, Zhao W J, Liu Y D, Chen Y Q, Yang J. Simulation of forces acting on the cutter blade surfaces and root system of sugarcane using FEM and SPH coupled method. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2021; 180: 105893.
[28] Do T V, Pham T M, Hao H. Stress wave propagation and structural response of precast concrete segmental columns under simulated blast loads. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2020; 143: 103595.
[2] Santoro E, Soler E M, Cherri A C. Route optimization in mechanized sugarcane harvesting. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2017; 141: 140–6.
[3] Xie D B, Chen L, Liu L C, Chen L Q, Wang H. Actuators and sensors for application in agricultural robots: A review. Machines, 2022; 10(10): 913.
[4] Bai J, Ma S C, Wang F L, Xing H N, Ma J Z, Hu J W. Field test and evaluation on crop dividers of sugarcane chopper harvester. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2021; 14(1): 118–122.
[5] Liu X P, Niu Z J, Li M, Hou M X, Wei L J, Zhang Y, et al. Design and experimental research on disc-type seeding device for single-bud sugarcane seeds. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2023; 16(2): 115–124.
[6] Wang F L, Zhang W H, Di M L, Wu X H, Song Z H, Xie B, et al. Sugarcane cutting quality using contra-rotating basecutters. Transactions of the ASABE, 2019; 62(3): 737–47.
[7] Momin M A, Wempe P A, Grift T E, Hansen A C. Effects of four base cutter blade designs on sugarcane stem cut quality. Transactions of the ASABE, 2017; 60(5): 1551–60.
[8] Xie L X, Wang J, Cheng S M, Zeng B S, Yang Z Z. Performance evaluation of a chopper system for sugarcane harvester. Sugar Tech, 2019; 21(5): 825–837.
[9] Mo H N, Li S P, Zhou J H, Zeng B, He G Q, Qiu C. Simulation and experimental investigations on the sugarcane cutting mechanism and effects of influence factors on the cutting quality of small sugarcane harvesters under vibration excitations. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022; 2022: 1–28.
[10] Li Z, Lin Z L, Li S Y, Zhang H. Optimization research on the working parameters of sugarcane harvester on the cutting time of stalks using virtual prototype technology. Sugar Tech, 2023; 25(1): 41–56.
[11] Bai J, Ma S C, Ke W L, Wang F L, Xing H N, Ma J Z, et al. Experimental research on sugarcane under-the-ground basecutting. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 2020; 36(3): 331–339.
[12] Mathanker S K, Grift T E, Hansen A C. Effect of blade oblique angle and cutting speed on cutting energy for energycane stems. Biosystems Engineering, 2015; 133: 64–70.
[13] Wang F L, Ma S C, Xing H N, Bai J, Ma J, Wang M L. Effect of contra-rotating basecutter parameters on basecutting losses. Sugar Tech, 2021; 23(2): 278–285.
[14] Rashvand M, Altieri G, Genovese F, Li Z G, Di Renzo G C. Numerical simulation as a tool for predicting mechanical damage in fresh fruit. Post-harvest Biology and Technology, 2022; 187: 111875.
[15] Wang T, Liu Z D, Yan X L, Mi G P, Liu S Y, Chen K Z, et al. Finite element model construction and cutting parameter calibration of wild chrysanthemum stem. Agriculture-Basel, 2022; 12(6): 894.
[16] Niu Z J, Xu Z, Deng J T, Zhang J, Pan S J, Mu H T. Optimal vibration parameters for olive harvesting from finite element analysis and vibration tests. Biosystems Engineering, 2022; 215: 228–238.
[17] Liu H J, Han X W, Fadiji T, Li Z, Ni J. Prediction of the cracking susceptibility of tomato pericarp: Three-point bending simulation using an extended finite element method. Post-harvest Biology and Technology, 2022; 187.
[18] Xie L X, Wang J, Cheng S M, Zeng B S, Yang Z Z. Optimisation and finite element simulation of the chopping process for chopper sugarcane harvesting. Biosystems Engineering, 2018; 175: 16–26.
[19] Qiu M M, Meng Y M, Li Y Z, Shen X B. Sugarcane stem cut quality investigated by finite element simulation and experiment. Biosystems Engineering, 2021; 206: 135–149.
[20] Wang Q Q, Zhang Q W, Zhang Y, Zhou G A, Li Z Q, Chen L Q. Lodged sugarcane/crop dividers interaction: analysis of robotic sugarcane harvester in agriculture via a rigid-flexible coupled simulation method. Actuators, 2022; 11(1): 23.
[21] Dai J P, Huang J K, Chen L H, Ji J N, Li J. Three-dimensional constitutive relation of the root-soil composite using homogenization theory. Transactions of the CSAE, 2022; 38(13): 76–83. (in Chinese)
[22] Xie L X, Wang J, Cheng S M, Zeng B S, Yang Z Z. Optimisation and dynamic simulation of a conveying and top breaking system for whole-stalk sugarcane harvesters. Biosystems Engineering, 2020; 197: 156–169.
[23] Huang H D, Wang Y X, Tang Y Q, Zhao F, Kong X F. Finite element simulation of sugarcane cutting. Transactions of the CSAE, 2011; 27(2): 161–166. (in Chinese)
[24] Mello R D C, Harris H. Hogarth D M. Cane damage and mass losses for conventional and serrated basecutter blades. Proc Aust Soc Sugar Cane Tech, 2000; 6: 84–91.
[25] Luo Y Q, Ren Y H, Zhou Z X, Huang X M, Song T J. Prediction of single-tooth sawing force based on tooth profile parameters. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016; 86(1-4): 641–650.
[26] Zhou Y, Qu Y G, Mo Z F. Design and experiment of oblique cutting and feeding device for sugarcane. Transactions of the CSAE, 2012; 28(14): 17–23. (in Chinese)
[27] Yang W, Zhao W J, Liu Y D, Chen Y Q, Yang J. Simulation of forces acting on the cutter blade surfaces and root system of sugarcane using FEM and SPH coupled method. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2021; 180: 105893.
[28] Do T V, Pham T M, Hao H. Stress wave propagation and structural response of precast concrete segmental columns under simulated blast loads. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2020; 143: 103595.
Downloads
Published
2024-07-11
How to Cite
Liu, T., Wang, Q., He, J., Xie, D., Liu, Z., Liu, L., & Chen, L. (2024). Analysis of the mechanical transfer characterization between lodged sugarcane and the cutter by simulation modeling with UMAT subroutine. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 17(3), 39–49. Retrieved from https://ijabe.migration.pkpps03.publicknowledgeproject.org/index.php/ijabe/article/view/8880
Issue
Section
Applied Science, Engineering and Technology
License
IJABE is an international peer reviewed open access journal, adopting Creative Commons Copyright Notices as follows.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
