Experiment and parameter optimization of an automatic row following system for the traction beet combine harvester
Keywords:
beet, combine harvester, traction type, parameter optimization, automatic row followingAbstract
To improve the automation level and operation quality of China's beet harvester and reduce the loss due to damaged and missed excavation, this study used a self-developed sugar beet combine harvester and field simulation experiment platform, based on the single-factor bench test of the automatic row following system in the early stage, taking hydraulic flow A, spring preload B, and forward speed C which have significant influence on performance indices as test factors, and taking the missed excavation rate, breakage rate and reaction time as performance indices, the orthogonal experimental study on the parameter optimization of the three-factor and three-level automatic row following system with the first-order interaction of various factors was carried out. The results of the orthogonal experiments were analyzed using range analysis and variance analysis. The results showed that there were differences in the influence degree, factor priority order and first-order interaction, and the optimal parameter combination on each performance index. A weighted comprehensive scoring method was used to optimize and analyze each index. The optimal parameter combination of the overall operating performance of the automatic row following system was A2B2C1, that is, the hydraulic flow was 25 L/min, the forward speed was 0.8 m/s, and the spring preload was 198 N. Under this combination, the response time was 0.496 s, the missed excavation rate was 2.35%, the breakage rate was 3.65%, and the operation quality was relatively good, which can meet the harvest requirements. The comprehensive optimization results were verified by field experiments with different ridge shapes and different planting patterns. The results showed that the mean values of the missed excavation rate of different planting patterns of conventional straight ridges and extremely large "S" ridges were 2.23% and 2.69%, respectively, and the maximum values were 2.39% and 2.98%, respectively; the average damage rates were 3.38% and 4.14%, and the maximum values were 3.58% and 4.48%, which meet the industry standards of sugar beet harvester operation quality. The overall adaptability of the automatic row following system is good. This study can provide a reference for research on automatic row following harvesting systems of sugar beets and other subsoil crop harvesters. Keywords: beet, combine harvester, traction type, parameter optimization, automatic row following DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20231601.7245 Citation: Wang S Y, Gao X M, You Z Y, Peng B L, Wu H C, Hu Z C, et al. Experiment and parameter optimization of an automatic row following system for the traction beet combine harvester. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2023; 16(1): 145–152.References
[1] Wang F Y. Optimization and field experiment of an adjustable device for sugar beet diggers. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2021; 14(6): 68–74.
[2] Wang Z, Wang F, Wang N, Li Y D, Tan B Y, Liu Z D. Research status and prospect of beet picking harvester. Agricultural Engineering, 2022; 12(2): 17–22. (in Chinese)
[3] Wang F Y, Zhang Z Y, Pan Y F, Yun Y L, Wang D W. Optimized design of the 4TSQ-2 sugar beet top cutting machine. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2022; 15(2): 111–116.
[4] Marchant W T B, Chittey E T. Automatic control of sugar beet harvester shares. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1966; 11(3): 188–200.
[5] O'Dogherty M J. A geometrical model to define the limits of accuracy of sugar beet topping. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1986; 35(1): 55–66.
[6] Bulgakov V, Arak M, Boris A, Boris M, Bandura V, Olt J. Experimental study of the distribution of the heights of sugar beet root crowns above the soil surface. Agronomy Research, 2019; 17(6): 2211–2219.
[7] Prochazka J. Force relationships and power requirements of sugar beet shares. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1967; 12(2): 152–170.
[8] Bulgakov V, Adamchuk V, Arak M, Olt J. A theoretical study of haulm loss resulting from rotor topper oscillation. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2017; 58: 223–228.
[9] Bulgakov V, Adamchuk V, Nozdrovicky L, Ihnatiev Y. Theory of vibrations of sugar beet leaf harvester front-mounted on universal tractor. Acta Technologica Agriculturae, 2017; 4: 96–103.
[10] Billington W P. The design and development of a skew bar topper for sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1984; 29(4): 329–335.
[11] Ivanetz G, Ovsyanko V, Vyrski A. Computer modeling of beet harvester digging bodies-soil interaction. Journal of Research & Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 2007; 52(1): 8–12.
[12] Ivancan S, Sito S, Fabijanic G. Factors of the quality of performance of sugar beet combine harvesters. Die Bodenkultur, 2002; 53(3): 161–166.
[13] Tillett N D, Hague T, Miles S J. Inter-row vision guidance for mechanical weed control in sugar beet. Computers & Electronics in Agriculture, 2002; 33(3): 163–177.
[14] Tsukor V, Strothmann W, Schwamm W, Ruckelshausen A. Contactless Sensor System for Row Navigation and Automatic Depth Control for a Sugar Beet Harvester using a 3D Time of Flight (ToF) Camera. Word Conference on Computers in Agriculture and Natural Resources, San Jose Costa Rica, Paper Book, 2014; 1–8.
[15] Zhang G F, Xu W L, Fan S X. Analysis and parameter optimization of adjustable beet top cutting mechanism. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013; 29(18): 26–33. (in Chinese)
[16] Li Y. Design and study of system of auto-picking and separating seedling for plug-transplanter. Master dissertation. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2015; 68p. (in Chinese)
[17] Wang F, Tan B Y, Wang Z, Liu Z D, Li J D, Yang W. Development of 4TJ beet harvester. Agricultural Engineering, 2021; 11(12): 16–19.
[18] Li J D, Yang W, Jia J X, Du Y Q, Wang D W, Zhao J. Combined digging device with automatic accompanying guide for beet. Agricultural Engineering, 2015; 5(2): 19–21. (in Chinese)
[19] Gou A M. Structure design on the beet roof cutting machine. Journal of Xinjiang Vocation University, 2012; 20(2): 75–77, 80. (in Chinese)
[20] Wu H C, Hu Z C, Peng B L, Gu F W, Wang H O, Wang B K. Development of auto-follow row system employed in pull-type beet combine harvester. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013; 29(12): 17–24. (in Chinese)
[21] Wang S Y, Hu Z C, Wu H C, Peng B L, Wang H O, Wu F. Design simulation and test of auto-follow row control system employed in beet harvester based on Proteus. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2014; 35(3): 35–40. (in Chinese)
[22] Wang S Y, Hu Z C, Peng B L, Wu H C, Gu F W, Wang H O. Simulation of auto-follow row detection mechanism in beet harvester based on ADAMS. Transactions of the CSAM, 2013; 44(12): 62–67. (in Chinese)
[23] Wang S Y, Hu Z C, Wu H C, Peng B L, Xie H X, Gu F W. Design and test of hydraulic correction execution system in automated row-followed for beet harvester. Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2016; 38(3): 155–162. (in Chinese)
[24] Gu F W, Hu Z C, Wu H C, Peng B L, Gao X M, Wang S Y. Development and experiment of 4LT-A staggered-dig sugar beer combine. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014; 30(23): 1–9. (in Chinese)
[25] Jia H L, Gu B L, Ma Z Y, Liu H L, Wang G, Li M W, et al. Optimized design and experiment of spiral-type intra-row weeding actuator for maize (Zea mays L.) planting. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2021; 14(6): 54–60.
[26] Yu Z Y, Hu Z C, Peng B L, Gu F W, Yang L, Yang M J. Experimental determination of restitution coefficient of garlic bulb based on high-speed photography. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2021; 14(2): 81–90.
[27] Dai F, Song X F, Zhao W Y, Shi R J, Zhang F W, Zhang X K. Mechanism analysis and performance improvement of mechanized ridge forming of whole plastic film mulched double ridges. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2020; 13(5): 107–116.
[28] NY/T1412-2007. , Operating quality of sugar beet harvester, 2007. (in Chinese)
[29] Wang R X, Zhao X P, Ji J T, Jin X, Li B. Design and performance analysis of tangential-axial flow threshing device for oat harvester. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2021; 14(6): 61–67.
[30] Ma P B, Li L Q, Wen B Q, Xue Y H, Kan Z, Li J B. Design and parameter optimization of spiral-dragon type straw chopping test rig. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2020; 13(1): 47–56.
[31] Gao X M, Xie H X, Gu F W, Wei H, Liu M J, Yan J C, et al. Optimization and experiment of key components in pneumatic peanut pod conveyor. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2020; 13(3): 100–107.
[2] Wang Z, Wang F, Wang N, Li Y D, Tan B Y, Liu Z D. Research status and prospect of beet picking harvester. Agricultural Engineering, 2022; 12(2): 17–22. (in Chinese)
[3] Wang F Y, Zhang Z Y, Pan Y F, Yun Y L, Wang D W. Optimized design of the 4TSQ-2 sugar beet top cutting machine. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2022; 15(2): 111–116.
[4] Marchant W T B, Chittey E T. Automatic control of sugar beet harvester shares. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1966; 11(3): 188–200.
[5] O'Dogherty M J. A geometrical model to define the limits of accuracy of sugar beet topping. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1986; 35(1): 55–66.
[6] Bulgakov V, Arak M, Boris A, Boris M, Bandura V, Olt J. Experimental study of the distribution of the heights of sugar beet root crowns above the soil surface. Agronomy Research, 2019; 17(6): 2211–2219.
[7] Prochazka J. Force relationships and power requirements of sugar beet shares. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1967; 12(2): 152–170.
[8] Bulgakov V, Adamchuk V, Arak M, Olt J. A theoretical study of haulm loss resulting from rotor topper oscillation. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2017; 58: 223–228.
[9] Bulgakov V, Adamchuk V, Nozdrovicky L, Ihnatiev Y. Theory of vibrations of sugar beet leaf harvester front-mounted on universal tractor. Acta Technologica Agriculturae, 2017; 4: 96–103.
[10] Billington W P. The design and development of a skew bar topper for sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1984; 29(4): 329–335.
[11] Ivanetz G, Ovsyanko V, Vyrski A. Computer modeling of beet harvester digging bodies-soil interaction. Journal of Research & Applications in Agricultural Engineering, 2007; 52(1): 8–12.
[12] Ivancan S, Sito S, Fabijanic G. Factors of the quality of performance of sugar beet combine harvesters. Die Bodenkultur, 2002; 53(3): 161–166.
[13] Tillett N D, Hague T, Miles S J. Inter-row vision guidance for mechanical weed control in sugar beet. Computers & Electronics in Agriculture, 2002; 33(3): 163–177.
[14] Tsukor V, Strothmann W, Schwamm W, Ruckelshausen A. Contactless Sensor System for Row Navigation and Automatic Depth Control for a Sugar Beet Harvester using a 3D Time of Flight (ToF) Camera. Word Conference on Computers in Agriculture and Natural Resources, San Jose Costa Rica, Paper Book, 2014; 1–8.
[15] Zhang G F, Xu W L, Fan S X. Analysis and parameter optimization of adjustable beet top cutting mechanism. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013; 29(18): 26–33. (in Chinese)
[16] Li Y. Design and study of system of auto-picking and separating seedling for plug-transplanter. Master dissertation. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2015; 68p. (in Chinese)
[17] Wang F, Tan B Y, Wang Z, Liu Z D, Li J D, Yang W. Development of 4TJ beet harvester. Agricultural Engineering, 2021; 11(12): 16–19.
[18] Li J D, Yang W, Jia J X, Du Y Q, Wang D W, Zhao J. Combined digging device with automatic accompanying guide for beet. Agricultural Engineering, 2015; 5(2): 19–21. (in Chinese)
[19] Gou A M. Structure design on the beet roof cutting machine. Journal of Xinjiang Vocation University, 2012; 20(2): 75–77, 80. (in Chinese)
[20] Wu H C, Hu Z C, Peng B L, Gu F W, Wang H O, Wang B K. Development of auto-follow row system employed in pull-type beet combine harvester. Transactions of the CSAE, 2013; 29(12): 17–24. (in Chinese)
[21] Wang S Y, Hu Z C, Wu H C, Peng B L, Wang H O, Wu F. Design simulation and test of auto-follow row control system employed in beet harvester based on Proteus. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2014; 35(3): 35–40. (in Chinese)
[22] Wang S Y, Hu Z C, Peng B L, Wu H C, Gu F W, Wang H O. Simulation of auto-follow row detection mechanism in beet harvester based on ADAMS. Transactions of the CSAM, 2013; 44(12): 62–67. (in Chinese)
[23] Wang S Y, Hu Z C, Wu H C, Peng B L, Xie H X, Gu F W. Design and test of hydraulic correction execution system in automated row-followed for beet harvester. Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2016; 38(3): 155–162. (in Chinese)
[24] Gu F W, Hu Z C, Wu H C, Peng B L, Gao X M, Wang S Y. Development and experiment of 4LT-A staggered-dig sugar beer combine. Transactions of the CSAE, 2014; 30(23): 1–9. (in Chinese)
[25] Jia H L, Gu B L, Ma Z Y, Liu H L, Wang G, Li M W, et al. Optimized design and experiment of spiral-type intra-row weeding actuator for maize (Zea mays L.) planting. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2021; 14(6): 54–60.
[26] Yu Z Y, Hu Z C, Peng B L, Gu F W, Yang L, Yang M J. Experimental determination of restitution coefficient of garlic bulb based on high-speed photography. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2021; 14(2): 81–90.
[27] Dai F, Song X F, Zhao W Y, Shi R J, Zhang F W, Zhang X K. Mechanism analysis and performance improvement of mechanized ridge forming of whole plastic film mulched double ridges. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2020; 13(5): 107–116.
[28] NY/T1412-2007. , Operating quality of sugar beet harvester, 2007. (in Chinese)
[29] Wang R X, Zhao X P, Ji J T, Jin X, Li B. Design and performance analysis of tangential-axial flow threshing device for oat harvester. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2021; 14(6): 61–67.
[30] Ma P B, Li L Q, Wen B Q, Xue Y H, Kan Z, Li J B. Design and parameter optimization of spiral-dragon type straw chopping test rig. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2020; 13(1): 47–56.
[31] Gao X M, Xie H X, Gu F W, Wei H, Liu M J, Yan J C, et al. Optimization and experiment of key components in pneumatic peanut pod conveyor. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2020; 13(3): 100–107.
Downloads
Published
2023-03-13
How to Cite
Wang, S., Gao, X., You, Z., Peng, B., Wu, H., Hu, Z., & Wang, Y. (2023). Experiment and parameter optimization of an automatic row following system for the traction beet combine harvester. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 16(1), 145–152. Retrieved from https://ijabe.migration.pkpps03.publicknowledgeproject.org/index.php/ijabe/article/view/7245
Issue
Section
Power and Machinery Systems
License
IJABE is an international peer reviewed open access journal, adopting Creative Commons Copyright Notices as follows.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
