Anti-blocking performance of ultrahigh-pressure waterjet assisted furrow opener for no-till seeder
Keywords:
waterjet, ultrahigh-pressure, conservation tillage, maize stalks, cutting, no-till, anti-blockingAbstract
No-till planting method is widely used for maize-wheat two-crops-a-year area in the North China Plain. However, cruel soil conditions, especially the large number of maize stalks which are hard to cutoff covering, often cause an unsatisfying planting quality. Based on the authors’ previous investigation, ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) waterjet is capable to solve this problem and obtain qualified seedbeds. Thus, a UHP waterjet assisted furrow opener for no-till seeder was designed. Field tests showed that double-disc furrow openers worked well with UHP waterjet, since the sharpened disc blades could help to cut soil and residue, meanwhile, minimize soil disturbance. Response surface method (RSM) was used to investigate the relationship among forward speed, waterjet pressure, jet impingement angle and anti-blocking performance (stalks cutoff ratio and depth of soil cutting), and a Box-Behnken three-factor design was used to identify the optional operation parameters. A total of 17 combinations were conducted, and the results showed all three operation parameters significantly affected anti-blocking performance. Stalks cutoff ratio and depth of soil cutting increased with the increase of waterjet pressure, jet impingement angle, and decreased with the increase of forward speed. The optimization analysis indicated that when waterjet pressure was 267-280 MPa, jet impingement angle was 80.2° to 90.0° and forward speed was 4.00-4.42 km/h, the overall performance of UHP waterjet assisted double-disc furrow opener for no-till seeder was maximized. Stalks cutoff ratio could be above 95% and no blockage occurred. This study may provide a new approach and reference for the anti-blocking technology of no-tillage seeding. Keywords: waterjet, ultrahigh-pressure, conservation tillage, maize stalks, cutting, no-till, anti-blocking DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20201302.5630 Citation: Hu H N, Li H W, Wang Q J, He J, Lu C Y, Wang Y B, et al. Anti-blocking performance of ultrahigh-pressure waterjet assisted furrow opener for no-till seeder. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2020; 13(2): 64–70.References
[1] Pittelkow C M, Liang X Q, Linquist B A, van Groenigen K J, Lee J, Lundy M K, et al. Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature, 2015; 517(7534): 365–368.
[2] Wang Q, Zhu L T, Li M W, Huang D Y, Jia H L. Conservation agriculture using coulters: Effects of crop residue on working performance. Sustain., 2018; 10(11): 1–15.
[3] Rolf D, Theodor F, Amir K, Li H. Current status of adoption of no-till farming in the world and some of its main benefits. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 2010; 3(1): 1–25.
[4] Yang L, Zhang R, Gao N N, Cui T, Liu Q W, Zhang D X. Performance of no-till corn precision planter equipped with row cleaners. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 2015; 8(5): 15–25.
[5] Zeng Z, Chen Y. The performance of a fluted coulter for vertical tillage as affected by working speed. Soil Tillage Res., 2018; 175: 112–118.
[6] Smith D R, Warnemuende-Pappas E A. Vertical tillage impacts on water quality derived from rainfall simulations. Soil Tillage Res., 2015; 153: 155–160.
[7] Matin M A, Fielke J M, Desbiolles J M A. Furrow parameters in rotary strip-tillage: Effect of blade geometry and rotary speed. Biosyst. Eng., 2014; 118(1): 7–15.
[8] Susuzlu T, Hoogstrate A M, Karpuschewski B. Initial research on the ultra-high pressure waterjet up to 700 MPa. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2004; 149(1-3): 30–36.
[9] Liu X C, Liang Z W, Wen G L, Yuan X F. Waterjet machining and research developments: a review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2019; 102: 1257–1335.
[10] Zhao Z, Yu C, Zhong J, Huang J, Zhang X. Numerical Simulation on Continuous Non-submerged Water Jet Vibration Cleaning Process for Granular Agricultural Products. Transactions of the CSAM, 2018; 49(8): 331–337. (in Chinese)
[11] Wang L, Chen Q. Experimental study on washing cherry tomatoes with submerged jets mechanism. Transactions of the CSAE, 2007; 23(9): 86–90. (in Chinese)
[12] Wang L, Ding X. Experimental investigation of washing vegetables with submerged jets of water. Transactions of the CSAE, 2007; 23(12):
124–130. (in Chinese)
[13] Wang L. Working principle and kinematic analysis of submerged jet vegetable washer. Transactions of the CSAE, 2007; 23(6): 130–135. (in Chinese)
[14] Wang J, Yang S, Xie Q, Yi J. Experiment and operating parameter optimization using water jet technology for scallops shucking processing. Transactions of the CSAE, 2017; 33(7): 289–294. (in Chinese)
[15] Rao R V, Rai D P, Balic J. Multi-objective optimization of abrasive waterjet machining process using Jaya algorithm and PROMETHEE Method. J. Intell. Manuf., 2019; 30(5): 2101–2127.
[16] Oh T M, Cho G C. Rock cutting depth model based on kinetic energy of abrasive waterjet. Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 2016; 49(3): 1059–1072.
[17] Aydin G, Karakurt I, Aydiner K. Prediction of the cut depth of granitic rocks machined by abrasive waterjet (AWJ). Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 2013; 46(5): 1223–1235.
[18] Aydin G, Karakurt I, Aydiner K. Performance of abrasive waterjet in granite cutting: Influence of the textural properties. J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 2012; 24(7): 944–949.
[19] Den Dunnen S, Kraaij G, Biskup C, Kerkhoffs G M M J, Tuijthof G J M. Pure waterjet drilling of articular bone: An in vitro feasibility study. Stroj. Vestnik/Journal Mech. Eng., 2013; 59(7–8): 425–432.
[20] Hu H, Li H, Wang Q, He J, Lu C, Wang Y, Wang C. Performance of waterjet on cutting maize stalks: A preliminary investigation. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 2019; 12(5): 64–70.
[21] Wang P, Zhao B, Ni H J, Li Z N, Liu Y D, Chen X Y. Research on the modulation mechanism and rock breaking efficiency of a cuttings waterjet. Energy Sci. Eng., 2019; 7(5): 1687–1704.
[22] Zhang X, Li H, Du R, Ma S, He J,Wang Q, et al. Effects of key design parameters of tine furrow opener on soil seedbed properties. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 2016; 9(3): 67–80.
[23] Chinese Standard Committee. No or little-tillage fertilizes-seeder, GB/T 20865-2017. Chinese Standard Press, China, 2017. (in Chinese).
[24] Qin K, Ding W, Ahmad F, Fang Z. Design and experimental validation of sliding knife notch-type disc opener for a no-till combine harvester cum seed drill. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 2018; 11(4): 76–85.
[25] Chaudhuri D. Performance evaluation of various types of furrow openers on seed drills - a review. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 2001; 79(2): 125–137.
[26] Solhjou A, Fielke J M, Desbiolles J M A. Soil translocation by narrow openers with various rake angles. Biosyst. Eng., 2012; 112(1): 65–73.
[27] Mabrouki T, Raissi K, Cornier A. Numerical simulation and experimental study of the interaction between a pure high-velocity waterjet and targets: Contribution to investigate the decoating process. Wear, 2000; 239(2): 260–273.
[28] Karakurt I, Aydin G, Aydiner K. An experimental study on the depth of cut of granite in abrasive waterjet cutting. Mater. Manuf. Process., 2012; 27(5): 538–544
[29] Yuvaraj N, Kumar M P. Investigation of process parameters influence in abrasive water jet cutting of D2 steel. Mater. Manuf. Process., 2017; 32(2): 151–161.
[30] Li H, Wang J. An experimental study of abrasive waterjet machining of Ti-6Al-4V. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2015; 81(1-4): 361–369.
[31] Thanomputra S, Kiatiwat T. Simulation study of cutting sugarcane using fine sand abrasive waterjet. Agric. Nat. Resour., 2016; 50(2): 146–153.
[32] Xue Y, Si H, Xu D, Yang Z. Experiments on the microscopic damage of coal induced by pure water jets and abrasive water jets. Powder Technol., 2018; 332(2017): 139–149.
[2] Wang Q, Zhu L T, Li M W, Huang D Y, Jia H L. Conservation agriculture using coulters: Effects of crop residue on working performance. Sustain., 2018; 10(11): 1–15.
[3] Rolf D, Theodor F, Amir K, Li H. Current status of adoption of no-till farming in the world and some of its main benefits. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 2010; 3(1): 1–25.
[4] Yang L, Zhang R, Gao N N, Cui T, Liu Q W, Zhang D X. Performance of no-till corn precision planter equipped with row cleaners. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 2015; 8(5): 15–25.
[5] Zeng Z, Chen Y. The performance of a fluted coulter for vertical tillage as affected by working speed. Soil Tillage Res., 2018; 175: 112–118.
[6] Smith D R, Warnemuende-Pappas E A. Vertical tillage impacts on water quality derived from rainfall simulations. Soil Tillage Res., 2015; 153: 155–160.
[7] Matin M A, Fielke J M, Desbiolles J M A. Furrow parameters in rotary strip-tillage: Effect of blade geometry and rotary speed. Biosyst. Eng., 2014; 118(1): 7–15.
[8] Susuzlu T, Hoogstrate A M, Karpuschewski B. Initial research on the ultra-high pressure waterjet up to 700 MPa. J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2004; 149(1-3): 30–36.
[9] Liu X C, Liang Z W, Wen G L, Yuan X F. Waterjet machining and research developments: a review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2019; 102: 1257–1335.
[10] Zhao Z, Yu C, Zhong J, Huang J, Zhang X. Numerical Simulation on Continuous Non-submerged Water Jet Vibration Cleaning Process for Granular Agricultural Products. Transactions of the CSAM, 2018; 49(8): 331–337. (in Chinese)
[11] Wang L, Chen Q. Experimental study on washing cherry tomatoes with submerged jets mechanism. Transactions of the CSAE, 2007; 23(9): 86–90. (in Chinese)
[12] Wang L, Ding X. Experimental investigation of washing vegetables with submerged jets of water. Transactions of the CSAE, 2007; 23(12):
124–130. (in Chinese)
[13] Wang L. Working principle and kinematic analysis of submerged jet vegetable washer. Transactions of the CSAE, 2007; 23(6): 130–135. (in Chinese)
[14] Wang J, Yang S, Xie Q, Yi J. Experiment and operating parameter optimization using water jet technology for scallops shucking processing. Transactions of the CSAE, 2017; 33(7): 289–294. (in Chinese)
[15] Rao R V, Rai D P, Balic J. Multi-objective optimization of abrasive waterjet machining process using Jaya algorithm and PROMETHEE Method. J. Intell. Manuf., 2019; 30(5): 2101–2127.
[16] Oh T M, Cho G C. Rock cutting depth model based on kinetic energy of abrasive waterjet. Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 2016; 49(3): 1059–1072.
[17] Aydin G, Karakurt I, Aydiner K. Prediction of the cut depth of granitic rocks machined by abrasive waterjet (AWJ). Rock Mech. Rock Eng., 2013; 46(5): 1223–1235.
[18] Aydin G, Karakurt I, Aydiner K. Performance of abrasive waterjet in granite cutting: Influence of the textural properties. J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 2012; 24(7): 944–949.
[19] Den Dunnen S, Kraaij G, Biskup C, Kerkhoffs G M M J, Tuijthof G J M. Pure waterjet drilling of articular bone: An in vitro feasibility study. Stroj. Vestnik/Journal Mech. Eng., 2013; 59(7–8): 425–432.
[20] Hu H, Li H, Wang Q, He J, Lu C, Wang Y, Wang C. Performance of waterjet on cutting maize stalks: A preliminary investigation. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 2019; 12(5): 64–70.
[21] Wang P, Zhao B, Ni H J, Li Z N, Liu Y D, Chen X Y. Research on the modulation mechanism and rock breaking efficiency of a cuttings waterjet. Energy Sci. Eng., 2019; 7(5): 1687–1704.
[22] Zhang X, Li H, Du R, Ma S, He J,Wang Q, et al. Effects of key design parameters of tine furrow opener on soil seedbed properties. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 2016; 9(3): 67–80.
[23] Chinese Standard Committee. No or little-tillage fertilizes-seeder, GB/T 20865-2017. Chinese Standard Press, China, 2017. (in Chinese).
[24] Qin K, Ding W, Ahmad F, Fang Z. Design and experimental validation of sliding knife notch-type disc opener for a no-till combine harvester cum seed drill. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng., 2018; 11(4): 76–85.
[25] Chaudhuri D. Performance evaluation of various types of furrow openers on seed drills - a review. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 2001; 79(2): 125–137.
[26] Solhjou A, Fielke J M, Desbiolles J M A. Soil translocation by narrow openers with various rake angles. Biosyst. Eng., 2012; 112(1): 65–73.
[27] Mabrouki T, Raissi K, Cornier A. Numerical simulation and experimental study of the interaction between a pure high-velocity waterjet and targets: Contribution to investigate the decoating process. Wear, 2000; 239(2): 260–273.
[28] Karakurt I, Aydin G, Aydiner K. An experimental study on the depth of cut of granite in abrasive waterjet cutting. Mater. Manuf. Process., 2012; 27(5): 538–544
[29] Yuvaraj N, Kumar M P. Investigation of process parameters influence in abrasive water jet cutting of D2 steel. Mater. Manuf. Process., 2017; 32(2): 151–161.
[30] Li H, Wang J. An experimental study of abrasive waterjet machining of Ti-6Al-4V. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2015; 81(1-4): 361–369.
[31] Thanomputra S, Kiatiwat T. Simulation study of cutting sugarcane using fine sand abrasive waterjet. Agric. Nat. Resour., 2016; 50(2): 146–153.
[32] Xue Y, Si H, Xu D, Yang Z. Experiments on the microscopic damage of coal induced by pure water jets and abrasive water jets. Powder Technol., 2018; 332(2017): 139–149.
Downloads
Published
2020-04-10
How to Cite
Hu, H., Li, H., Wang, Q., He, J., Lu, C., Wang, Y., & Liu, P. (2020). Anti-blocking performance of ultrahigh-pressure waterjet assisted furrow opener for no-till seeder. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 13(2), 64–70. Retrieved from https://ijabe.migration.pkpps03.publicknowledgeproject.org/index.php/ijabe/article/view/5630
Issue
Section
Power and Machinery Systems
License
IJABE is an international peer reviewed open access journal, adopting Creative Commons Copyright Notices as follows.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
