Improving biomethane yield by strengthening acidification of maize stover in two-phase anaerobic digestion

Authors

  • Huan Tong 1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China; 2. China Shipbuilding New Power Co., Ltd., Beijing 100097, China
  • Baoyu Zhou 1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
  • Chunmei Liu 1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China; 3. Beijing Sound Environmental Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 101102, China
  • Akiber Chufo Wachemo 1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China; 4. Department of Water Supply and Environmental Engineering, Arba Minch University, P.O.Box 21, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
  • Xiujin Li 1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
  • Xiaoyu Zuo 1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China

Keywords:

alkaline pretreatment, two-phase anaerobic digestion, strengthening acidification, maize stover, reactor, biogas, biomethane production

Abstract

In this study, the acidification and two-phase anaerobic digestion (AD) were conducted in batch and continuous stirred tank reactors, respectively, to determine the effect of acidification on methane production in AD. The results showed that two-phase AD achieved an observable enhancement in the methane production under optimal acidification conditions (organic loading rate of 60 g TS/L, the ratio of raw material to inoculum (based on dry weight) of 2:1, the temperature of 45°C, urea concentration of 4%, and time of 6 d). Under these conditions, the daily biogas and biomethane productions were 0.48 L/g TS and 0.30 L/g TS, respectively, which were 26.32% and 57.89% higher than those of the untreated group, respectively. The ammonia nitrogen (AN), alkalinity, and pH value of the methanogenic phase of C4 continued to increase up to 956 mg/L, 5680 mg/L, and 7.41, respectively, after 60 d, which might have destroyed the stability of the system. Therefore, for the purpose of reusing the nitrogen source, reducing AN, and maintaining the stability of the reaction system, another set of acidification and two-phase AD with water pretreatment using the discharge of the methanogenic phase of C4 as the inoculum was subsequently conducted. The results showed that the daily biogas productions of single-phase and two-phase AD were 5.26% and 15.79% higher than that of the untreated group, respectively; similarly, their daily methane yields were 10.42% and 21.05% higher than that of the untreated group. Keywords: alkaline pretreatment, two-phase anaerobic digestion, strengthening acidification, maize stover, reactor, biogas, biomethane production DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20201304.4654 Citation: Tong H, Zhou B Y, Liu C M, Wachemo A C, Li X J, Zuo X Y. Improving biomethane yield by strengthening acidification of maize stover in two-phase anaerobic digestion. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2020; 13(4): 226–231.

Author Biographies

Huan Tong, 1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China; 2. China Shipbuilding New Power Co., Ltd., Beijing 100097, China

Department of Environmental Science and Engineering

Baoyu Zhou, 1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China

Department of Environmental Science and Engineering

Chunmei Liu, 1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China; 3. Beijing Sound Environmental Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 101102, China

Department of Environmental Science and Engineering(BUCT)

Akiber Chufo Wachemo, 1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China; 4. Department of Water Supply and Environmental Engineering, Arba Minch University, P.O.Box 21, Arba Minch, Ethiopia

Department of Environmental Science and Engineering(BUCT) ; Department of Water Supply and Environmental Engineering(AMU).

Xiujin Li, 1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China

Department of Environmental Science and Engineering

Xiaoyu Zuo, 1. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China

Department of Environmental Science and Engineering

References

[1] National Bureasu of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China, 2016. http://www.stats.gov.cn/.
[2] Zheng M X, Li X J, Li L Q, Yang X J, He Y F. Enhancing anaerobic biogasification of corn stover through wet state NaOH pretreatment. Bioresource Technology, 2009; 100(21): 5140–5145.
[3] Wang G, Gavala H N, Skiadas I V, Ahring B K. Wet explosion of wheat straw and codigestion with swine manure: Effect on the methane productivity. Waste Manag, 2009; 29(11): 2830–2835.
[4] Wang F, Yin H, Li S. China’s renewable energy policy: Commitments and challenges. Energy Policy, 2010; 38(4): 1872–1878.
[5] Li Y Q, Liu C M, Wachemo A C, Yuan H R, Zou D X, Liu Y P, et al. Serial completely stirred tank reactors for improving biogas production and substance degradation during anaerobic digestion of corn stover. Bioresour Technol., 2017; 235: 380–388.
[6] Tsavkelova E A. Biogas production from cellulose-containing substrates: A review. Applied Biochemistry & Microbiology, 2012; 48(5): 421–433.
[7] Deswarte F E I, Clark J H, Wilson A J, Hardy J J E, Marriott R, Chahal S P, et al. Toward an integrated straw-based biorefinery. Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining, 2010; 1(4): 245–254.
[8] Smith D P, Mccarty P L. Reduced product formation following perturbation of ethanol- and propionate-fed methanogenic CSTRs. Biotechnology & Bioengineering, 1989; 34(7): 885–895.
[9] Bouallagui H, Torrijos M, Godon J J, Moletta R, Cheikh R B, Touhami Y, et al. Two-phases anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes: Bioreactors performance. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2004; 21(2): 193–197.
[10] Cysneiros D, Banks C J, Heaven S, Karatzas K A. The role of phase separation and feed cycle length in leach beds coupled to methanogenic reactors for digestion of a solid substrate (Part 2): Hydrolysis, acidification and methanogenesis in a two-phase system. Bioresource Technology, 2011; 102(16): 7393–7400.
[11] Grover R, Marwaha S S, Kennedy J F. Methanogenesis of black liquor in a two-stage biphasic reactor system using an immobilized cell system. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 2010; 76(3): 251–256.
[12] Roberts R, Davies W J, Forster C F. Two-stage, thermophilic-mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Process Safety & Environmental Protection, 1999; 77(2): 93–97.
[13] Grimberg S J, Hilderbrandt D, Kinnunen M, Rogers S. Anaerobic digestion of food waste through the operation of a mesophilic two-phase pilot scale digester - Assessment of variable loadings on system performance. Bioresource Technology, 2015; 178: 226–229.
[14] Demi̇Rer G N, Chen S. Two-phase anaerobic digestion of unscreened dairy manure. Process Biochemistry, 2005; 40(11): 3542–3549.
[15] Massanetnicolau J, Dinsdale R, Guwy A, Shipley G. Use of real time gas production data for more accurate comparison of continuous single-stage and two-stage fermentation. Bioresource Technology, 2013; 129(2): 561–567.
[16] Min L, Ren N Q, Ying C, Zhu W F, Jie D. Conversion regular patterns of acetic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid in UASB reactor. Journal of Enviermental Sciences, 2004; 16(3): 387–391.
[17] Lay J J. Modeling and optimization of anaerobic digested sludge converting starch to hydrogen. Biotechnology & Bioengineering, 2015; 68(3): 269–278.
[18] Cha G C, Noike T. Effect of rapid temperature change and HRT on anaerobic acidogenesis. Water Science & Technology, 1997; 36(6-7): 247–253.
[19] Chen H, Meng H, Nie Z, Zhang M. Polyhydroxyalkanoate production from fermented volatile fatty acids: effect of pH and feeding regimes. Bioresour Technol., 2013; 128(1): 533–538.
[20] Jiang J, Zhang Y, Li K, Wang Q, Gong C, Li M. Volatile fatty acids production from food waste: Effects of pH, temperature, and organic loading rate. Bioresour Technol., 2013; 143(9): 525–530.
[21] Liu X, Dong B, Dai X. Hydrolysis and acidification of dewatered sludge under mesophilic, thermophilic and extreme thermophilic conditions: Effect of pH. Bioresource Technology, 2013; 148(8): 461–466.
[22] Zhou A, Guo Z, Yang C, Kong F, Liu W, Wang A. Volatile fatty acids productivity by anaerobic co-digesting waste activated sludge and corn straw: Effect of feedstock proportion. Journal of Biotechnology, 2013; 168(2): 234–239.
[23] Rajagopal R, Massé D I, Singh G. A critical review on inhibition of anaerobic digestion process by excess ammonia. Bioresource Technology, 2013; 143(17): 632–641.
[24] Liu C F, Yuan X Z, Zeng G M, Li W W, Li J. Prediction of methane yield at optimum pH for anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Bioresour Technol., 2008; 99(4): 882–888.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-07

How to Cite

Tong, H., Zhou, B., Liu, C., Wachemo, A. C., Li, X., & Zuo, X. (2020). Improving biomethane yield by strengthening acidification of maize stover in two-phase anaerobic digestion. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 13(4), 226–231. Retrieved from https://ijabe.migration.pkpps03.publicknowledgeproject.org/index.php/ijabe/article/view/4654

Issue

Section

Renewable Energy and Material Systems