Effect of aerial spray adjuvant applying on the efficiency of small unmanned aerial vehicle for wheat aphids control

Authors

  • Yanhua Meng (1. College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; 2. National Center for International Collaboration Research on Precision Agricultural Aviation Pesticide Spraying Technology, Guangzhou 510642, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Aviation Plant Protection, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China
  • Yubin Lan 1. College of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; 2. National Center for International Collaboration Research on Precision Agricultural Aviation Pesticide Spraying Technology, Guangzhou 510642, China
  • Guiying Mei School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
  • Yongwang Guo The National Agro-Tech Extension and Service Center, Beijing 100125, China
  • Jianli Song College of Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
  • Zhiguo Wang 1. Key Laboratory of Aviation Plant Protection, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China; 2. Anyang Quanfeng Biological Technology Co., Ltd, Anyang 455000, China

Keywords:

unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), aerial spraying adjuvant, deposition, control efficiency, pesticide residue, wheat aphid

Abstract

Small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been widely used in different aspects of modern farming management, including pest and disease control in China in recent years. In this study, the spray performance of a small plant protection UAV at low volume spray was evaluated by adjusting the pesticide dosage and adding aerial spraying adjuvants. Droplet deposition, droplet density, coverage, control effect and pesticide residue from field trials were assessed. In addition, the residue and control effect of UAV spray were compared to manual knapsack at high volume spray. The results showed that, the adjuvant applying improved the efficiency of UAV spray. Also, the adjuvant applying reduced the dosage of imidacloprid by 20%. However, there was no significant difference on initial residue between UAV spray and knapsack spray. Thus, plant protection UAV spraying pesticide by adding appropriate adjuvant showed the ability of improving the pesticide effectiveness by improving the control efficiency, reducing the pesticide dosage and residue. Keywords: unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), aerial spraying adjuvant, deposition, control efficiency, pesticide residue, wheat aphid DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20181105.4298 Citation: Meng Y H, Lan Y B, Mei G Y, Guo Y W, Song J L, Wang Z G. Effect of aerial spray adjuvant applying on the efficiency of small unmanned aerial vehicle on wheat aphids control. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(5): 46–53.

References

[1] Curtis B C, Rajaram S, Gómez Macpherson H. Bread wheat: improvement and production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2002; 103–117.
[2] Shewry P R. Wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2009; 60(6): 1537–1553.
[3] National Bureau of statistics of China. http://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery. htm?cn=C01&zb=A0D0F&sj=2016
[4] Chen J L. The control of wheat aphids. Beijing Jindun Publisher, 2014; pp.1–12. (in Chinese)
[5] Qin W C, Xue X Y, Zhang S M, Gu W, Wang B K. Droplet deposition and efficiency of fungicides sprayed with small UAV against wheat powdery mildew. Int J of Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(2): 27–32.
[6] Chen S D, Lan Y B, Li J Y, Zhou Z Y, Liu A M, Mao Y D. Effect of wind field below unmanned helicopter on droplet deposition distribution of aerial spraying. Int J of Agric & Biol Eng, 2017; 10(3): 67–77.
[7] He X K. Improving severe draggling actuality of plant protection machinery and its application techniques. Trans of the CSAE, 2004; 20(1): 13–15. (in Chinese)
[8] Garcerá C, Moltóo E, Chueca P. Effect of spray volume of two organophosphate pesticides on coverage and on mortality of California red scale Aonidiella auranii (Maskell). Crop Protection, 2011; 30: 693–687.
[9] Poulsen M E, Wenneker M, Withagen J, Christensen H B. Pesticide residues in individual versus composite samples of apples after fine or coarse spray quality application. Crop Protection, 2012; 35: 5–14.
[10] Sánchez-Hermosilla J, Rincón VJ, Páez F, Agϋera F, Carvajal F. Field evaluation of a self-propelled sprayer and effects of the application rate on spray deposition and losses to the ground in greenhouse tomato crops. Pest Management Science, 2011; 67: 942–947.
[11] Guo Y W, Yuan H Z, He X K, Shao Z R. Analysis on the development and prospect of aviation plant protection. China Plant Protection, 2014; 34: 78–82. (in Chinese)
[12] Xue X Y, Lan Y B, Agricultural aviation applications in USA. Trans of the CSAE, 2013; 44(5): 194–199. (in Chinese)
[13] Zhou Z Y, Zang Y, Luo X W, Lan Y B, Xue X Y. Technology innovation development strategy on agricultural aviation industry for plant protection in China. Trans of the CSAE, 2013; 29(24): 1–10. (in Chinese)
[14] Gao Y Y, Zhang Y T, Zhang N, Niu L, Zheng W W, Yuan H Z. Primary studies on spray droplets distribution and control effects of aerial spraying using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) against Wheat Midge. Crops, 2013; 2: 139–142. (in Chinese)
[15] Xue X Y, Qin W C, Sun Z, Zhang S C, Zhou L X , Wu P. Effects of N-3 UAV spraying methods on the efficiency of insecticides against planthoppers and Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. Acta Phytophyl Acica Sinca, 2013; 40(3): 273–278. (in Chinese)
[16] Qin W C, Qiu B J, Xue X X, Chen C, Xu F Z. Droplet deposition and control effect of insecticides sprayed with an unmanned aerial vehicle against plant hoppers. Crop Protection, 2016; 85: 79–88.
[17] Holloway P J. Physicochemical factors influencing the adjuvant- enhanced spray deposition and coverage of foliage-applied agrochemicals. In: Interactions between adjuvants, agrochemicals and target organisms. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1994; pp.83–106.
[18] Gaskin R E, Manktelow D W, Skinner S J, Elliot G S. Use of a superspreader adjuvant to reduce spray application volumes on avocados. New Zealand Avocado Growers’ Association Annual Research Report, 2014; 4: 8–12.
[19] Fritz B K, Hoffmann W C, Bretthauer S, Wolf R E, Bagley W E. Wind tunnel and field evaluation of drift from aerial spray applications with multiple spray formulations. Pesticide formulations and delivery systems: innovating legacy products; for new uses, 32ND volume, 2013; 1558: 96–113.
[20] Wang X N, He X K, Song J L, Andreas H. Effect of adjuvant types and concentration on spray drift potential of different nozzles. Trans of the CSAE, 2015; 31(22): 49–55. (in Chinese)
[21] Zhou A. Preparation and performance evaluation of settling agent with low volume spray. MS dissertation. Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, 2016.
[22] Xue X Y, Tu K, Lan Y B, Qin W C, Zhang L. Effects of pesticides aerial applications on rice quality. Trans of the CSAM, 2013; 44(12): 94–98. (in Chinese)
[23] Zhu H, Salyani M, Fox R D. A portable scanning system for evaluation of spray deposit distribution. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2011; 76(1): 38–43.
[24] Institute for the control of Agrochemicals MoA. Standard operating procedures on pesticide registration residue field trials. Standards Press of China, Beijing, 2007.
[25] GB/T 17980.79—2004. Pesticide--Guidelines for the field efficacy trials (Ⅱ)--Part 79: Insecticides against aphids on wheat. Standards Press of China, Beijing, 2004.
[26] Gervais J A, Luukinen B, Buhl K, Stone D. Imidacloprid technical fact sheet. National Pesticide Information Center, 2012.
Pesticide Information Profiles: Imidacloprid Breaz. Extension Toxicology Network, 2012.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-29

How to Cite

Meng, Y., Lan, Y., Mei, G., Guo, Y., Song, J., & Wang, Z. (2018). Effect of aerial spray adjuvant applying on the efficiency of small unmanned aerial vehicle for wheat aphids control. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 11(5), 46–53. Retrieved from https://ijabe.migration.pkpps03.publicknowledgeproject.org/index.php/ijabe/article/view/4298

Issue

Section

Applied Science, Engineering and Technology